Certified Arborist Test 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

Selecting that there is no risk if there is no target reflects a misunderstanding of how risk is assessed in arboriculture and other fields. In risk management, a "target" usually refers to a person, property, or asset that could be negatively impacted by a potential hazard. If there is no target present, it suggests that there would be no one or nothing that could be harmed.

However, this does not mean that no risk exists per se. It simply implies that any potential risks may not have immediate consequences because there are no identifiable targets that could be affected. Risks might still exist in a broader context, such as the tree's health, structural integrity, or potential for failure, but without a target, the implications of those risks are diminished. Thus, the notion of a complete absence of risk is not accurate.

In practice, understanding risk includes assessing both the inherent risk of a situation and the potential impact on targets. Therefore, the idea that no risk exists is misleading and oversimplifies the complexity of risk management. The absence of a target indicates that the impact may be negligible or non-existent, but risks should still be considered and monitored.